Advanced Processing Capabilities of FCR
CR vs. DR
The fundamental question facing most imaging departments is: How do
I include General Radiography in my transition to a filmless future? Determining
whether Storage Phosphor Imaging or future flat panels is the best alternative
to take your department digital requires a thorough understanding of the technology
behind the process, their respective advantages and disadvantages, and, importantly,
the costs to delivering the quality and efficiency you demand.
UNDERSTANDING THE TECHNOLOGY
Computed Radiography (CR) describes the process of bringing X-Ray technology
into an enterprise-wide digital future. CR is a process, NOT a product. CR
is an entire modality, not simply an acquisition device. CR should not be considered
equal to flat panels. Computed radiography describes an entire process of creating
a digital image. This includes the ability to Acquire, Process, Present and Manage
the image data. Flat panels describe a developing image acquisition technology.
Each acquisition technology has its own unique characteristics such as receptor
properties, physical implementation and results.
Acquisition Technologies
Several technologies currently exist to acquire digital images in a General X-ray
Environment.
- Storage Phosphor
is a photostimulable phosphor plate that emits retained X-ray energy when stimulated
by light.
- Amorphous Selenium
plates create a charge pattern in the selenium layer from an exposure. This pattern
is read out by a thin film transistor array or electrometer probes.
- Amorphous Silicon
photodiodes read an electrical signal that is read out by a thin film transistor
array. A scintillator must convert X-ray to light which then must be converted
again to become an electrical signal for readout.
UNDERSTANDING THE TECHNOLOGY
With current acquisition
technologies, taking your department to a filmless environment can provide better
workflow than film, regardless of the acquisition technology. Utilizing Storage
Phosphor as an acquisition technology provides several advantages to users.
Validation Advantage
Storage Phosphor has over 18 years of application experience and has been rigorously
studied for its suitability. This experience allows Storage Phosphor to offer
a wide range of validated exam protocols. Both Amorphous Selenium and Amorphous
Silicon acquisition technologies still require established processing protocols
as well as wide scale use for validation. One of the biggest hurdles facing flat
panel technology is the issue of “dead pixels”. These are pixels that are dead
and produce no imaging information. Manufacturers of these panels take imaging
information from surrounding pixels and basically clone this information into
the dead pixel area. Pixels on these panels can be “dead” when the panel is new,
or may die throughout the life of the panel. It is conceivable that the panel
could be bumped, jarred, or otherwise damaged, thereby killing the various pixels.
Portability Advantage
CR Readers can be used in conjunction with general X-ray equipment already in
place. Storage Phosphor IP’s replace X-ray film so that remote equipment can still
be utilized. CR Readers are durable, can be centrally located for increased access
and can cover a broad range of applications: Amorphous Selenium/Silicon acquisition
technologies are currently contained within radiographic equipment as a flat panel
with fragile pieces that may be difficult to use in portable applications. Moving
equipment presents a risk of breakage that can range in replacement costs from
$50,000 -$70,000.
Cost Per X-ray Cabinet
Advantage
Because Storage Phosphor IP’s can be used with an imaging department’s existing
equipment, taking an entire department digital can be attained with the purchase
of one CR Reader. Flat panel receptors using Amorphous Selenium (aSe) or Amorphous
Silicon (aSi) equipment must be purchased for every X-ray room to make an imaging
department filmless. Flat panels may be difficult to add to existing equipment.
Creating a filmless department using flat panel acquisition technologies will
require a substantially higher initial investment that current throughput predictions
will not be able to cost justify. For a quantitative analysis, Storage Phosphor
permits a lower cost when implementing a filmless environment.
Disadvantages exist
for every form of digital acquisition technology
Taking an imaging department digital will require a user to realistically consider
some compromises. Storage Phosphor, while increasing the efficiency of radiographic
processing, requires one incremental workflow step in the delivery of an IP to
the CR Reader but still improves efficiency over traditional X-ray film processing.
Flat Panels eliminate that workflow step but create a higher cost per x-ray cabinet
and makes portable imaging problematic. The user must determine whether the additional
expense is worth eliminating one workflow step.
FUTURE OF DIGITAL ACQUISITION
TECHNOLOGY?
Storage Phosphor will
be the predominant acquisition method of digital x-ray for the next decade.
Future imaging departments will likely utilize several different technologies
together. The nature of flat panels will encourage continued use of Storage Phosphor
in all applications.
Rates of Growth
Storage Phosphor is currently the only viable total departmental solution to take
X-ray to a digital future. Amorphous Selenium and Amorphous Silicon will play
a role only when the imaging department has a need for a new radiography or x-ray
cabinet. In this respect, flat panels will be implemented only when there is an
equipment replacement demand. With significant growth of the Digital market, Storage
Phosphor demand will grow at a rapid parallel rate as institutions reach a total
digital solution for the 70% of its radiographic exams
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
Digital X-Ray Cost
Per X-ray cabinet
It is anticipated that cost of CR and flat panels will decrease over the next
five years. In 2001, a flat panel detector is priced at approximately $200,000
per cabinet, serving only this cabinet. By 2003, one might see the price as low
as $150,000. In 2001, a Fuji CR is priced at approximately $100,000 per cabinet,
with the capability to service 2-3 cabinets. Five years later, the expected price
of acquisition might be $75,000.

| |
STORAGE
PHOSPHOR
|
FLAT
PANELS
|
|
Item
|
Per
room
per year cost
|
Item |
Per
room
per year cost
|
Replacement
items: |
IP's / Cassettes
- 6 per room
- 3 year life
- $1,550 per combination
|
$3,100
|
|
N/A
|
Service
(8% of list): |
|
$6,000
|
|
$18,000
|
Per
year
per room total: |
|
$9,100
|
|
$18,000
|
4
year
operational costs: |
|
$36,400
|
|
$72,000
|

|
Year
1
|
Year
2
|
Year
3
|
Year
4
|
Year
5
|
TOTAL
|
|
Capital
|
$75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational
|
|
$9,100
|
$9,100
|
$9,100
|
$9,100
|
$111,400
|
|
Capital
|
$225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational
|
|
$18,000
|
$18,000
|
$18,000
|
$18,000
|
$297,000
|
$185,600 Incremental
Expenditure Per Room
Typical Amoritization
Schedule for Imaging Capital Equipment is 5 Years.
|